Beyond the Algorithm: 10 Strategies for Attracting Young News Audiences

There are many assumptions but surprisingly little evidence of how to engage young audiences with news. Commonly voiced concerns are that young people just consume short-form video, trust creators more than news brands and won’t pay for news anyway because they are just not that interested, particularly not in politics. 

But reality is more nuanced: In some settings young people do trust media brands more than personalities, they follow the news avidly, and they demonstrate considerable attention spans if invested in something, even for text-based products. 

My co-author Jana Koch and I  tested these and more assumptions in a qualitative research project, commissioned by Austrian Wiener Zeitung Media Group. We based our study on structured interviews with young people and media leaders in Austria and with more than a dozen international experts, amounting to a total of 58 in-depth interviews. We then contrasted our findings with the latest research by leading organisations like the Reuters Institute’s “Understanding young news audiences” and the NextGen News project, a Knight Lab/FT Strategies cooperation. 

The full report, Knapp daneben ist auch vorbei is available in German and English  here

So, what is it exactly that media leaders need to know when serving young audiences? There is no one-size-fits-all solution, of course. But we have identified 10 evidence-based strategies to guide media leaders. 

1. Understand and Serve Audiences

There is no such thing as “the” young user. Expectations and habits differ not only between generational cohorts, but also within them. The old mass media formula “one size fits all” no longer works. You need to decide which community to serve on which platform, and to understand which codes to use to reach them. 

This can best be achieved by letting young colleagues in your organisation take the lead. 

Our interviews suggest: young users are indeed interested in politics, the economy, and international affairs, provided the perspective and narrative style suit them. 

Different platforms serve different purposes: Long podcasts, video documentaries, and games serve a different purpose than short videos, push notifications, and WhatsApp messages. 

What doesn’t work, for sure: Cramming everything into TikToks, or presenting every message as comedy. 

2. Add Value to People’s Lives

The digital world delivers content in abundance. Information overload and news avoidance are prevalent. Young people want to use their time wisely. 

They expect journalism to provide not just updates, but also explanations, solutions, and perspectives. 

They derive additional value from a particular voice or new forms of news experiences, local or niche context, narrative styles, or perspectives that surprise, dive deeper, or are closer to the reality of their lives. 

Marco Kruse, Managing Director of Ingame, Ippen Media’s youth initiative: “As a young person, you don’t just want to hear all day about the problems of the present; you want to know what your future looks like and what the solution is.” 

Doing less but doing it better is a valuable strategy. This holds particularly true for the AI era which is likely to put an end to copy-and-paste journalism

3. Be Confident

Journalism has something to offer, and young people get that. So, don’t sell yourself short, but deliver exactly what your core business is: independent, fact-based, strong journalism. Anyone determined to make any content funny or imitate slang is set up for failure. “Don’t try to be cool, because that is not your role”, says Pierre Caulliez, who leads Wan-Ifra’s News Creator Exchange programme. 

Users come to media brands precisely for what they can’t find elsewhere. And media companies can confidently promote that. The most successful German news brand on social media, public service ARD’s Tagesschau, shows how this can be done.

Timo Spiess, Tagesschau’s Head of Social Media, says: “We try to find a conversational tone (…) that conveys: ‘we take you seriously, we take this platform seriously, but we also take ourselves and our brand seriously.’”

4. Build Personal Brands

International research suggests that young people trust individuals more than brands. However, this perspective is shaped by experiences in countries like the US, where there are no public service media that have a mandate to serve all of society, or in settings where state interests have captured mainstream media. 

Creators sense gaps where they find them and happily step in. In contrast, our research shows that young adults in Austria and Germany continue to trust major media brands. 

However, individual creators gain traction when they have demonstrated clearly recognisable expertise in niche areas. 

That said, authenticity is a core value for young people. Amid the surging flood of automatically generated content, they’ve developed a particularly keen sense for whether something or someone is “real.” 

This opens opportunities for media: they can strategically build personal brands. The key though,  is not to stake everything on a single individual, but to develop clearly distinct voices. 

This also helps decrease the risk of losing popular content creators and their following. As Spiess describes: “The brand is the star. The brand is carried by faces. But these faces always step back a little behind the brand.”

5. Make Diversity Visible

Many young people are allergic to what newsrooms have long characterised as quality journalism: the know-it-all attitude, preachiness, complex phrasing, or irony and sarcasm. 

This suggests: Don’t talk about young people, but with them – and let them speak for themselves. Especially in ageing societies, the perspectives of young people are often overlooked. 

Co-creation can do wonders, but don’t assume that everyone wants to participate. In general, young people want more diversity of perspectives in news media, but this needs to go beyond the buzzword: different social backgrounds, experiences, and life stories need to be reflected. 

Funk, the youth network of German public media ARD and ZDF, for example, had determined through data analysis that it struggled to reach audiences with strong roots in rural areas. This led to “Sag mal,” which, in the words of Funk CEO Philipp Schild, became one of their most successful formats: “It focuses heavily on tradition and rural culture and is aimed at people who have a strong sense of identity in those areas.” 

Interestingly, the young Austrians we interviewed voiced rather traditional expectations in news, emphasising objectivity as a journalistic value. This contrasts with assumptions – also by some of our expert interview partners – that young audiences explicitly demand a point of view.  

6. Build and Retain Relationships

Media need to be present in the everyday lives of young adults to build connections, ideally relationships. Don’t wait for them to come to you, but go where they already are: on Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, in algorithmic feeds – or to their schools, youth clubs, and universities. 

Real-life encounters can foster closeness. If you can afford it, organise workshops, guided tours, even festivals. They do not necessarily need to be about media. Relationships are built through presence, relevance, and shared experiences.

Caulliez says that publishers underestimate the potential of events: “When someone attends a specific event, they are 10 times more likely to remember the brand than if they only watch 10 seconds of YouTube Shorts from the same brand. It creates added value to build connections to different types of events throughout a person’s entire life cycle.” 

7. Diversify Monetisation

Purely transactional monetisation models like subscriptions appeal to very few young adults, especially as, in many European countries, every household has to pay the public service media license fee. 

This does not rule out a willingness to spend money on private news media, but people will only pay for tangible added value such as an experience or a feeling of identity. 

Liesbeth Nizet, Head of Future Audiences Monetization at Mediahuis says: “Creating a sense of belonging is super important.” Many publishers fail to reach young people with their product offerings. Some are not even known to them, others come across as inflexible, overloaded, or outdated. Younger audiences are used to personalisation and choice. A student subscription alone is not an innovation.” 

Nadine Eibl (formerly Günther), new product and innovation manager at German publisher Funke says: “Media companies simply need to realise that it’s pointless to force the existing offers onto young audiences.” 

Our interview partners see products for young users primarily as an investment in the brand and thus the future; some found potential in branded content. Nevertheless, investing in young audiences often pays off in a different way.

Many media companies have learned that formats for younger people often attract broader segments of society than their traditional fare. 

8. Think in Formats

Simply investing in vertical short-form video won’t do the job. Social media channels differ, and the data from each platform reflects how the respective algorithms interpret certain signals.

Of course, this type of analysis is thankless, because just when you think you’ve figured out a pattern, third party-platforms might change it. A dataset compiled by the Financial Times in October 2025 for a story titled “Have we passed peak social media?” even revealed that time spent on social media has been declining since 2022.

Many young people are themselves unhappy with their excessive social media consumption, and political initiatives want to curb access for kids and teenagers. 

There is definitely a backlash against noise” says Nic Newman, Senior Research Associate at the Reuters Institute in Oxford. While the extent of news consumption via social media platforms will remain significant for a few more years, media companies should develop formats that could also thrive on their own platforms.

George Montagu, who oversaw the NextGen News project for FT Strategies, recommends redirecting energies from content to formats: “Right now, they (journalists) spend 80 to 90 percent of their time thinking, researching, and writing, and 10 percent figuring out ‘How do I package this for social media?’

“But what if they invested 50 percent in research and writing and 50 percent in turning that into something cool and innovative? No one is asking for more content. They’re asking to receive content in different formats and styles.”

9. Optimise for AI and Convenience

In the digital world, consumer expectations are shaped by Netflix, Spotify, and the like. This applies to both content and user-friendliness, the so-called user experience (UX). 

Journalistic products must be easily accessible and navigable. Younger consumers also expect that important news will somehow find them. With developments in AI, media consumption habits are likely to change. Much content might soon no longer be consumed directly by humans but read by machines first. 

However, many of our interviewees see opportunities for media companies in the world of synthetic content and overload. 

For example, verifying factual accuracy is becoming more important. And some professionals see an advantage precisely for brands that focus on people. 

Smilla Schwörer, business development manager at Funke and herself a Gen Z, says: “People overestimate how open young people are to AI. Young people want real people, real opinions, real faces, and real stories. I’d say the Boomer generation is much more likely to listen to an AI podcast than we are. We’re probably also a bit quicker at recognising AI and are therefore a bit more critical of the whole thing.”

10. Innovate Fast

The media industry is losing young audiences less due to a lack of ideas than a lack of courage. Innovation requires a different mindset: less fear of failure, less clinging to routines, and more trust in experimentation. Innovation-friendly leadership means allowing for setbacks and delegating responsibility but also shifting resources from declining to growing parts of the company. Young media professionals who understand the codes, languages, and dynamics of digital communities, should be encouraged to step up instead of being cornered into some social media team with no career prospects.

Sophia Smith Galer, independent news creator and member of Mediahuis’ Future Insight Board, recommends media leaders to make explicit that all staff is responsible for a company’s financial health: “Everyone should be required to do something to innovate every year”. 

Conclusion

Reaching young people is a challenging task that requires a strategy: it involves lots of data analysis, experimentation, and a shift in thinking. Many assumptions need to be discarded, along with the structures that go with them.

But Gen Z displays less news fatigue than is often claimed. Spiess from Tagesschau: “The younger generation also wants to dive deeper into things. … (Reaching young people) is a challenge. But it can be done.”

The reward for these efforts isn’t just about securing the future of a newsroom or a company. As Funk’s CEO Schild says: “Anyone who does something for young people is doing something for democracy.”

This text was written for and published by the World Association of Newspublishers Wan-Ifra on 12 June 2026.

“No one is asking for more content. They are just asking for it in different formats and different styles”

The “NextGen News” project by Knight Lab and FT Strategies belongs among the largest qualitative endeavors to uncover news consumption patterns and preferences by young people across the globe. So far, two reports have been published, the latest one discussion habits by young news consumers in the US, Brazil, India, Nigeria, and the UK. For our study, we interviewed George Montagu who led the project for FT Strategies until December 2025.  

FT Strategies is spearheading the international Young Audiences Initiative and in 2024 published a pathbreaking study on young news consumers, Next Gen News. Now you are doing an update. What have your most significant findings been?

George Montagu: One finding we are excited about is the idea of reversing the journalism process. Up until now, journalism production usually goes from: you have seen something or you have an idea, you research it, you write it, you edit it, and you publish it. Now, those on the innovative end of the scale think more in terms of format first: what’s the storytelling methodology that we use with this specific audience? And then they select stories based on that format and deliver them. 

How did you find out about that? Because you talked to creators and then they told you?

Yes, we have spoken to about 70 news creators from all around the world with different sizes of following on different platforms. One of the things they talk about is that they don’t try to make the news entertaining. They don’t select stories from the mainstream news and then add their sprinkle of expertise on top. They do it the other way around. They’ve figured out a structure, a tone, a set of topics that work for their audience, and then they select stories based on that structure. Audiences love the familiarity of a repetitive structure that packages information in a way that they enjoy consuming it in.

In your 2024 study you didn’t just survey young people, you looked at what they actually did. Did you observe any discrepancies between their behaviour and what they said they did?

We didn’t see a load of difference. I genuinely think younger people don’t care. They don’t have this concept of having to be this really engaged, newsy type person. One quite interesting behaviour many young people described was that after they had seen a piece of news on social media, they substantiated it with a big news brand that they know and trust. When we did diary studies, we saw that behaviour ring true. 

Did you see differences among the countries? You covered the US, the UK, Nigeria, India, and Brazil. 

There were differences in opinion, especially towards the health of the news industry and how trustworthy the news is. But the actual types of behaviours were similar across geographies. Our hypothesis is: Where there’s less trust, people tend to go more for creators and people they trust. We recently asked 13- to 18-year-olds: ‘Where do you get the news from?’ They gave an about equal amount of time to news influencers, friends and family, and news producers. However, when we asked them: ‘Who do you trust as sources of quality information?’, news producers were mentioned much more often than friends and family, and news creators got almost twice as much trust. Just because people give someone a lot of attention doesn’t mean they trust them. 

Our research shows that at least in Austria, young people trust news brands quite a bit.

It depends. If it’s information about beauty products, then they’re going to trust the beautiful individual in front of them more. If it’s about what’s going on in Gaza, they would probably prefer a mainstream news brand. News media used to cover all these needs, but now individuals often do a much better job with certain areas of expertise. 

What in general do institutions need to know if they want to reach young people today? 

Next Gen News focuses on the tactical things that you can do in storytelling, like putting your face on camera, making it personal, talking about your family and background. But at a much bigger level, we talk about investment allocation and distribution. A couple of decades ago, newspapers would spend 40% of their revenue on printing, distribution and vans. Today, news organizations have stripped lots of that cost from their business, but they don’t invest that money in new forms of distribution, which is video, audio, newsletters, and different types of formats. I’m trying to encourage news organizations to reinvest in distribution and new formats.

Wait, are newsletters a thing with young people? 

We didn’t hear loads of young people say that they like newsletters. What they do love is notifications. They absolutely love a good notification well timed with relevant information that links them off to somewhere else. But I also advise companies to reallocate the time journalists spend. Now, they spend 80 to 90% of their time thinking, writing, researching a story, and 10% figuring out, maybe, ‘how do I put this on socials’. But what if they invested 50% in reading, researching, writing and 50% in turning this into something cool and innovative? No one’s asking for more content. They’re just asking for it in different formats and different styles. 

Many publishers talk about “young audiences” as if they were a monolith. But commercial publishers often mean people in their 30s, because before that they wouldn’t buy subscriptions anyway. 

When we at FT Strategies speak to clients, we ask, ‘what is your young audience?’ Because they differ so much. At the FT we think of 18- to 35-year-olds who are more on the ambitious end of the spectrum and interested in careers, business, finance, and politics. Some people say up to 40 or 45 is young, because it makes their numbers look better. The generalizations and the stereotypes around younger people are not helpful. This concept of them just loving short form video exclusively and spending all their time there is wrong.

If editors-in-chief invite you and give you a time slot of 15 minutes asking what they should do? What do you tell them? 

First, I would recommend giving their journalists 30% to 40% more time to think about storytelling. Second, get your talent on camera and get them building affinity with your audiences by being authentic and telling stories. Third, increase your investment in distribution. What you need is people that are producers and that think in format terms rather than in story terms and give those people the power to work with your best journalists to create storytelling that is really alive. Finally, I would say that a lot of younger audiences don’t care much for objectivity or impartiality. Don’t be afraid to give some people the room to express their opinions and perspectives, even if they’re very different from the brand. Ultimately that builds connection and it’s what people want. 

Are there also young people who say they appreciate different viewpoints? 

Younger people don’t trust any of the information that they see first-hand. They always look for another reference point. And loads of the young people that we’ve interviewed say that they rely on building their own perspectives based on what other people say or think or share. That might be comment sections, it might be their favourite commentator, it might be another publication. Out of the 70 or so creators we talked to, maybe three or four said that they agreed with the concepts of objectivity and neutrality. The 66 others said that the idea of impartiality was fundamentally flawed and impossible at a theoretical level. They also said something like: ‘My audience doesn’t come to me for boring balance; they come to me because they value me and my opinion.’

What do you think are the most common mistakes newsrooms make – apart from people sitting around a desk saying: ‘Oh, what can we write for young people?’ 

The biggest mistake is a language and tone one. There’s still this approach of writing in an old school style that is meant to impress your colleagues more than your audience, insinuating: ‘Look, how imaginative and cool I’ve written this article!’ But a normal person just wants a normal tone of voice and vocabulary that they understand. Within that there’s a misconception that you have to dumb down language and make things really simple, which doesn’t mean making it simplistic. What you then realize is that 90% of people want the simple version of the story. So, the assumption that young people’s needs are totally distinct is quite bizarre. 

How will AI shape the news consumption behaviour of young people – who are obviously much more attuned to using it already. 

Obviously, a lot of younger people are using AI discovery tools to organize and find information for themselves. But their primary use cases are copy and pasting news into a chatbot asking, ‘can you summarize this for me?’ Or ‘can you simplify this for me so that I understand it?’ News companies should be doing this themselves on their own sites, so, that people aren’t taking their content off their platform.

Last autumn, the FT published a story asking, “Have we reached peak social media?” What should publishers do if that happens?

When I’m advising a company, I’ll say: ‘Think about formats, not platforms. What are the investments that you won’t regret making in format? Don’t think like: Let’s build a massive TikTok account and invest loads of money in that but: Let’s build a great short-form video portfolio and host it on our website, on our apps, on the watch tab as the New York Times now has? I’ve spoken to people with millions of followers on TikTok starting to tell me, ‘I’m good at seeing when the tide’s going out and I think the tide’s going out.’ But if people are not spending their time on socials, they’ll be spending their time elsewhere online. Private communities and channels seem to be the primary place where people are going to go and super apps when everything will be integrated in ChatGPT.

What do you think, what are the missing conversations around young audiences and news consumption?

It’s not the missing conversation, but it’s the really hard one: how do you make money off these people? 

When we asked young Austrians for our research what they would pay for, they said that they’d pay for something really individualized. 

This scares the living daylights out of me because 100% of that can be done. And it already is being done by chatbots and will only get better. For a lot of people fulfilling their news needs will be paying for a chatbot and being able to get summarized personalized news feeds based on their interests. People increasingly won’t pay for content, they’ll just pay for stuff associated to your brand, whether that’s events or products or whatever it is. But I would be really surprised if content remains a big differentiator for someone to be willing to pay for it. 

This interview was conducted as part of the study titled “A miss is as good as a mile: A qualitative study on Gen Z and journalism in Austria, featuring perspectives from users, media professionals, and international experts”, commissioned by Mediengruppe Wiener Zeitung. You can find more information and the full study (in German) here.