Beyond the Algorithm: 10 Strategies for Attracting Young News Audiences

There are many assumptions but surprisingly little evidence of how to engage young audiences with news. Commonly voiced concerns are that young people just consume short-form video, trust creators more than news brands and won’t pay for news anyway because they are just not that interested, particularly not in politics. 

But reality is more nuanced: In some settings young people do trust media brands more than personalities, they follow the news avidly, and they demonstrate considerable attention spans if invested in something, even for text-based products. 

My co-author Jana Koch and I  tested these and more assumptions in a qualitative research project, commissioned by Austrian Wiener Zeitung Media Group. We based our study on structured interviews with young people and media leaders in Austria and with more than a dozen international experts, amounting to a total of 58 in-depth interviews. We then contrasted our findings with the latest research by leading organisations like the Reuters Institute’s “Understanding young news audiences” and the NextGen News project, a Knight Lab/FT Strategies cooperation. 

The full report, Knapp daneben ist auch vorbei is available in German and English  here

So, what is it exactly that media leaders need to know when serving young audiences? There is no one-size-fits-all solution, of course. But we have identified 10 evidence-based strategies to guide media leaders. 

1. Understand and Serve Audiences

There is no such thing as “the” young user. Expectations and habits differ not only between generational cohorts, but also within them. The old mass media formula “one size fits all” no longer works. You need to decide which community to serve on which platform, and to understand which codes to use to reach them. 

This can best be achieved by letting young colleagues in your organisation take the lead. 

Our interviews suggest: young users are indeed interested in politics, the economy, and international affairs, provided the perspective and narrative style suit them. 

Different platforms serve different purposes: Long podcasts, video documentaries, and games serve a different purpose than short videos, push notifications, and WhatsApp messages. 

What doesn’t work, for sure: Cramming everything into TikToks, or presenting every message as comedy. 

2. Add Value to People’s Lives

The digital world delivers content in abundance. Information overload and news avoidance are prevalent. Young people want to use their time wisely. 

They expect journalism to provide not just updates, but also explanations, solutions, and perspectives. 

They derive additional value from a particular voice or new forms of news experiences, local or niche context, narrative styles, or perspectives that surprise, dive deeper, or are closer to the reality of their lives. 

Marco Kruse, Managing Director of Ingame, Ippen Media’s youth initiative: “As a young person, you don’t just want to hear all day about the problems of the present; you want to know what your future looks like and what the solution is.” 

Doing less but doing it better is a valuable strategy. This holds particularly true for the AI era which is likely to put an end to copy-and-paste journalism

3. Be Confident

Journalism has something to offer, and young people get that. So, don’t sell yourself short, but deliver exactly what your core business is: independent, fact-based, strong journalism. Anyone determined to make any content funny or imitate slang is set up for failure. “Don’t try to be cool, because that is not your role”, says Pierre Caulliez, who leads Wan-Ifra’s News Creator Exchange programme. 

Users come to media brands precisely for what they can’t find elsewhere. And media companies can confidently promote that. The most successful German news brand on social media, public service ARD’s Tagesschau, shows how this can be done.

Timo Spiess, Tagesschau’s Head of Social Media, says: “We try to find a conversational tone (…) that conveys: ‘we take you seriously, we take this platform seriously, but we also take ourselves and our brand seriously.’”

4. Build Personal Brands

International research suggests that young people trust individuals more than brands. However, this perspective is shaped by experiences in countries like the US, where there are no public service media that have a mandate to serve all of society, or in settings where state interests have captured mainstream media. 

Creators sense gaps where they find them and happily step in. In contrast, our research shows that young adults in Austria and Germany continue to trust major media brands. 

However, individual creators gain traction when they have demonstrated clearly recognisable expertise in niche areas. 

That said, authenticity is a core value for young people. Amid the surging flood of automatically generated content, they’ve developed a particularly keen sense for whether something or someone is “real.” 

This opens opportunities for media: they can strategically build personal brands. The key though,  is not to stake everything on a single individual, but to develop clearly distinct voices. 

This also helps decrease the risk of losing popular content creators and their following. As Spiess describes: “The brand is the star. The brand is carried by faces. But these faces always step back a little behind the brand.”

5. Make Diversity Visible

Many young people are allergic to what newsrooms have long characterised as quality journalism: the know-it-all attitude, preachiness, complex phrasing, or irony and sarcasm. 

This suggests: Don’t talk about young people, but with them – and let them speak for themselves. Especially in ageing societies, the perspectives of young people are often overlooked. 

Co-creation can do wonders, but don’t assume that everyone wants to participate. In general, young people want more diversity of perspectives in news media, but this needs to go beyond the buzzword: different social backgrounds, experiences, and life stories need to be reflected. 

Funk, the youth network of German public media ARD and ZDF, for example, had determined through data analysis that it struggled to reach audiences with strong roots in rural areas. This led to “Sag mal,” which, in the words of Funk CEO Philipp Schild, became one of their most successful formats: “It focuses heavily on tradition and rural culture and is aimed at people who have a strong sense of identity in those areas.” 

Interestingly, the young Austrians we interviewed voiced rather traditional expectations in news, emphasising objectivity as a journalistic value. This contrasts with assumptions – also by some of our expert interview partners – that young audiences explicitly demand a point of view.  

6. Build and Retain Relationships

Media need to be present in the everyday lives of young adults to build connections, ideally relationships. Don’t wait for them to come to you, but go where they already are: on Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, in algorithmic feeds – or to their schools, youth clubs, and universities. 

Real-life encounters can foster closeness. If you can afford it, organise workshops, guided tours, even festivals. They do not necessarily need to be about media. Relationships are built through presence, relevance, and shared experiences.

Caulliez says that publishers underestimate the potential of events: “When someone attends a specific event, they are 10 times more likely to remember the brand than if they only watch 10 seconds of YouTube Shorts from the same brand. It creates added value to build connections to different types of events throughout a person’s entire life cycle.” 

7. Diversify Monetisation

Purely transactional monetisation models like subscriptions appeal to very few young adults, especially as, in many European countries, every household has to pay the public service media license fee. 

This does not rule out a willingness to spend money on private news media, but people will only pay for tangible added value such as an experience or a feeling of identity. 

Liesbeth Nizet, Head of Future Audiences Monetization at Mediahuis says: “Creating a sense of belonging is super important.” Many publishers fail to reach young people with their product offerings. Some are not even known to them, others come across as inflexible, overloaded, or outdated. Younger audiences are used to personalisation and choice. A student subscription alone is not an innovation.” 

Nadine Eibl (formerly Günther), new product and innovation manager at German publisher Funke says: “Media companies simply need to realise that it’s pointless to force the existing offers onto young audiences.” 

Our interview partners see products for young users primarily as an investment in the brand and thus the future; some found potential in branded content. Nevertheless, investing in young audiences often pays off in a different way.

Many media companies have learned that formats for younger people often attract broader segments of society than their traditional fare. 

8. Think in Formats

Simply investing in vertical short-form video won’t do the job. Social media channels differ, and the data from each platform reflects how the respective algorithms interpret certain signals.

Of course, this type of analysis is thankless, because just when you think you’ve figured out a pattern, third party-platforms might change it. A dataset compiled by the Financial Times in October 2025 for a story titled “Have we passed peak social media?” even revealed that time spent on social media has been declining since 2022.

Many young people are themselves unhappy with their excessive social media consumption, and political initiatives want to curb access for kids and teenagers. 

There is definitely a backlash against noise” says Nic Newman, Senior Research Associate at the Reuters Institute in Oxford. While the extent of news consumption via social media platforms will remain significant for a few more years, media companies should develop formats that could also thrive on their own platforms.

George Montagu, who oversaw the NextGen News project for FT Strategies, recommends redirecting energies from content to formats: “Right now, they (journalists) spend 80 to 90 percent of their time thinking, researching, and writing, and 10 percent figuring out ‘How do I package this for social media?’

“But what if they invested 50 percent in research and writing and 50 percent in turning that into something cool and innovative? No one is asking for more content. They’re asking to receive content in different formats and styles.”

9. Optimise for AI and Convenience

In the digital world, consumer expectations are shaped by Netflix, Spotify, and the like. This applies to both content and user-friendliness, the so-called user experience (UX). 

Journalistic products must be easily accessible and navigable. Younger consumers also expect that important news will somehow find them. With developments in AI, media consumption habits are likely to change. Much content might soon no longer be consumed directly by humans but read by machines first. 

However, many of our interviewees see opportunities for media companies in the world of synthetic content and overload. 

For example, verifying factual accuracy is becoming more important. And some professionals see an advantage precisely for brands that focus on people. 

Smilla Schwörer, business development manager at Funke and herself a Gen Z, says: “People overestimate how open young people are to AI. Young people want real people, real opinions, real faces, and real stories. I’d say the Boomer generation is much more likely to listen to an AI podcast than we are. We’re probably also a bit quicker at recognising AI and are therefore a bit more critical of the whole thing.”

10. Innovate Fast

The media industry is losing young audiences less due to a lack of ideas than a lack of courage. Innovation requires a different mindset: less fear of failure, less clinging to routines, and more trust in experimentation. Innovation-friendly leadership means allowing for setbacks and delegating responsibility but also shifting resources from declining to growing parts of the company. Young media professionals who understand the codes, languages, and dynamics of digital communities, should be encouraged to step up instead of being cornered into some social media team with no career prospects.

Sophia Smith Galer, independent news creator and member of Mediahuis’ Future Insight Board, recommends media leaders to make explicit that all staff is responsible for a company’s financial health: “Everyone should be required to do something to innovate every year”. 

Conclusion

Reaching young people is a challenging task that requires a strategy: it involves lots of data analysis, experimentation, and a shift in thinking. Many assumptions need to be discarded, along with the structures that go with them.

But Gen Z displays less news fatigue than is often claimed. Spiess from Tagesschau: “The younger generation also wants to dive deeper into things. … (Reaching young people) is a challenge. But it can be done.”

The reward for these efforts isn’t just about securing the future of a newsroom or a company. As Funk’s CEO Schild says: “Anyone who does something for young people is doing something for democracy.”

This text was written for and published by the World Association of Newspublishers Wan-Ifra on 12 June 2026.

“Let go of your structures, because those structures will guarantee that you will not succeed”

German public service media ARD and ZDF run a joint network called FUNK that has the mission and mandate to serve young people. For our study on Gen Z and News, commissioned by Wiener Zeitung Media Group, I interviewed FUNK CEO Philipp Schild. 

Philipp, what do media companies need to know if they want to reach young people today?

Young people are used to consuming content very much based on their personal needs. This wasn’t possible with linear broadcast content in the same way as it is in the digital sphere. And that changes everything. The market is highly fragmented, and users expect everything to be perfectly tailored to them. Creators who aren’t used to stepping outside their own perspective, adopting a different one and working to understand it will find it hard to succeed.

When needs are so varied, whose perspective do you adopt? After all, there is no uniform ‘young’ audience.

We can’t choose; we have a mandate. Section 30c of Germany’s State Media Treaty stipulates that our content must appeal to young people aged between 14 and 29 and focus on their real-life experiences and interests. But these vary greatly. Imagine a 14-year-old and a 29-year-old. What needs do they actually have in common? For us as content creators, there’s only one sensible approach: to use a structured database to understand which people we’re not yet effectively serving across our portfolio. And then we need to consider how to reach them. It’s about understanding what codes these people need so that they perceive the content as being made for them.

How well do you reach different groups?

With 70 formats, Funk reaches 75 per cent of the target audience. We reach a few percentage points more highly educated young people than those with lower levels of education, but the differences aren’t huge. We really do our best to ensure there’s something for everyone. Our analyses have shown that we haven’t reached groups quite as effectively that are strongly attached to their home villages. Our content was more popular in urban areas. We’ve tackled this in various new formats.

Can you illustrate that with examples?

One thing worked particularly well: ‘Sagt mal’ (tell us) is actually one of our most successful formats. It focuses heavily on tradition and rural culture and aims at people who identify strongly with these aspects. However, we’ve found that it’s much easier for us to build contacts and film with people in western German towns than in eastern Germany, where there’s greater resentment towards public service media. There, we have to work much harder to build trust and invest a lot more time preparing before we can finally start filming. But we just get on with it, and then it works out.

Doesn’t the sense of community – which public-service media are supposed to foster – fall by the wayside when you tailor your content very closely to specific groups or communities?

A strong sense of identity within a community can prevent others from joining in. But you can overcome this by providing content that addresses universal needs. A format can become hugely popular if many people can identify with it. One example is Mai Thi (Nguyen Kim) with maiLab. She started out as a chemical scientist and remained relatively small for a while. Then she began to explore more and more topics that appeal to everyone. During the COVID-19 pandemic, her stuff suddenly became interesting for society as a whole.

The most controversial topic in our interviews was subjectivity. Experts said there was no point approaching young people with objectivity; they wanted a clear stance, authenticity and emotion. The young users we interviewed in Austria, on the other hand, valued objectivity, and studies such as the Digital News Report also document a need for at least a degree of professional distance. Are the respondents giving the answers researchers want to hear?

We carried out a study on subjectivity with Prof. Christoph Neuberger, who described ten different dimensions of subjectivity. This revealed that emotion is not always the key to success. There are very, or relatively, objective formats – such as 70-second Wikis with a clear factual basis – that are extremely successful. Emotion does not necessarily mean approaching things from a subjective perspective. It can simply mean feeling an emotional connection to a group. Of course, social media fosters emotions. But that does not mean at all that young people are no longer interested in information or facts. The need for a high level of source reliability is extremely high amongst parts of our audiences.

Young people are largely already using AI tools. How will new consumption habits in the AI era change the media industry?

The content market will change completely. Ten years ago, we might still have been able to make how-to videos. Who needs those anymore? Young people might even need fewer guidance from us on coming-of-age topics, because they’re forming relationships with ChatGPT. It may be that we need to completely rethink our approach and instead support them and build media literacy around these topics.

But AI can also help, for example, with switching between formats.

Above all, AI helps us with our workflows. We spend five days analysing a format and processing all the data. A machine can do that for you in an hour. That doesn’t mean that, in the end, anything at our company will function without people, but it does mean that, whilst people are still in the loop, a very large proportion of the work currently carried out by people can be done by machines. And the potential savings I see there, I’m channelling into AI profiles.

If you could give newsroom leaders three pieces of advice on what to bear in mind regarding young people and journalism, what would these be?

Firstly, let go of your structures, because those structures will guarantee that you won’t succeed. In five years’ time, you simply won’t be around anymore. The market is brutal. There’s going to be a revolution in content generation and distribution. We’re already preparing for that. Point two: Adjust your budgets. You need to consider who will be using your content in the future. And you must tailor your budgets to them. Your entire structure is still geared towards serving the people who are there at the moment, but they won’t be around for much longer. And they may well have started getting their content from YouTube in the meantime. And thirdly, listen to the people who understand how young people’s content works and try to rebuild your structures in collaboration with them. Or, if you’re too big for that: create a dedicated unit, investing a significant portion of your budget as an investment for the future. Then, at some point, you’ll reap the benefits of the ideas that grow within these units.

What is not discussed enough when it comes to young people and the media?

Product development is always just about what we do, and very rarely about the end result, what sticks in people’s minds and what it triggers. Nevertheless, media professionals should keep reminding themselves: anyone who does something for young people is doing something for democracy.

This interview was led for the research study “Knapp daneben ist auch vorbei” that was published in April 2026 by Mediengruppe Wiener Zeitung. It is available in the original German version here.